← WebMCP Directory

incident-command-jet.vercel.app

incident-command-jet.vercel.app

demo Unverified (seed import) AI & Agents 3 tools imperative implementation

Agent-supervised incident response simulator for practicing safe investigation, approval, and recovery.

First seen 2026-09-14 · Last seen 2026-09-14 · Source: webmcp.com

Answer 1 · Act 2 · Transact 0 · Score: Not yet scored

Tool inspector

propose_response

act imperative

Record an evidence-backed hypothesis and optionally a complete mitigation. Mitigation fields are all-or-none; rollback and traffic_shift always require two trusted human approvals.

Input schema

PropertyTypeRequiredDescription
summary string yes The current evidence-backed explanation of the incident. Record uncertainty plainly instead of presenting a guess as fact.
evidence array yes Concrete observations returned by investigate_incident that support the hypothesis, not unsupported assertions.
confidence number yes Your certainty in the hypothesis from 0 to 1. It never changes whether an action is permitted.
mitigationType string no The proposed response. Supply all mitigation fields together; rollback and traffic_shift change production and always require human approval.
targetServiceId string no The service this mitigation acts on. Only services still inside the human-approved scope appear in this list.
rationale string no Why this mitigation follows from the observed evidence. Supply it with every other mitigation field.
expectedOutcome string no The measurable recovery expected if the mitigation is correct. Supply it with every other mitigation field.
riskLevel string no Classify the action risk. Rollback and traffic_shift are always treated as high and require two trusted human approvals; low and medium are for advisory work only.
Raw JSON schema
{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "summary": {
      "type": "string",
      "minLength": 8,
      "description": "The current evidence-backed explanation of the incident. Record uncertainty plainly instead of presenting a guess as fact."
    },
    "evidence": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "A concrete observation from investigation."
      },
      "minItems": 1,
      "description": "Concrete observations returned by investigate_incident that support the hypothesis, not unsupported assertions."
    },
    "confidence": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 0,
      "maximum": 1,
      "description": "Your certainty in the hypothesis from 0 to 1. It never changes whether an action is permitted."
    },
    "mitigationType": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "rollback",
        "traffic_shift",
        "status_update"
      ],
      "description": "The proposed response. Supply all mitigation fields together; rollback and traffic_shift change production and always require human approval."
    },
    "targetServiceId": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "checkout",
        "payments",
        "inventory",
        "orders",
        "cdn"
      ],
      "description": "The service this mitigation acts on. Only services still inside the human-approved scope appear in this list."
    },
    "rationale": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Why this mitigation follows from the observed evidence. Supply it with every other mitigation field."
    },
    "expectedOutcome": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The measurable recovery expected if the mitigation is correct. Supply it with every other mitigation field."
    },
    "riskLevel": {
      "type": "string",
      "enum": [
        "low",
        "medium",
        "high"
      ],
      "description": "Classify the action risk. Rollback and traffic_shift are always treated as high and require two trusted human approvals; low and medium are for advisory work only."
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "summary",
    "evidence",
    "confidence"
  ],
  "dependentRequired": {
    "mitigationType": [
      "targetServiceId",
      "rationale",
      "expectedOutcome",
      "riskLevel"
    ],
    "targetServiceId": [
      "mitigationType",
      "rationale",
      "expectedOutcome",
      "riskLevel"
    ],
    "rationale": [
      "mitigationType",
      "targetServiceId",
      "expectedOutcome",
      "riskLevel"
    ],
    "expectedOutcome": [
      "mitigationType",
      "targetServiceId",
      "rationale",
      "riskLevel"
    ],
    "riskLevel": [
      "mitigationType",
      "targetServiceId",
      "rationale",
      "expectedOutcome"
    ]
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}

Similar websites

cesium-browser-agent.pages.dev

cesium-browser-agent.pages.dev

Cesium Agent Lab

live Unverified AI & Agents
61 tools A8 / Act53 / T0 Not yet scored Seen 2026-09-14
flyTo setView getView zoomToExtent saveViewpoint
Inspect tools
hunchbank.com

hunchbank.com

Let visitors get things done without filling out a single form. Hunch turns every form on your site into a tool visitors can run by chatting in plain English. N…

live Unverified AI & Agents Transact tools
47 tools A7 / Act33 / T7 Not yet scored Seen 2026-09-14
search_1 get_products search_and_list extract_page_listings navigate_flight_search
Inspect tools
sssnack.com

sssnack.com

Agent-made visual feed. Browse, self-register, and publish via MCP or A2A with no connection auth.

live Unverified AI & Agents
35 tools A15 / Act20 / T0 Not yet scored Seen 2026-09-14
start_registration register_agent recover_agent_token discover_snacks search_snacks
Inspect tools
computer.webmcp.com

computer.webmcp.com

WebMCP Computer — one browser machine shared by a human and an agent.

demo Unverified AI & Agents Transact tools
30 tools A11 / Act17 / T2 Not yet scored Seen 2026-09-14
app_open app_close app_list window_focus window_move
Inspect tools

Related on Influzer